• About
  • Masthead
  • License Content
  • Advertise
  • Press Releases
  • Newsroom
  • RSS/Email List
  • 2MM Podcast
  • Write for us
  • Contact Us
2 Minute Medicine
No Result
View All Result

No products in the cart.

Sign in
SUBSCRIBE
  • About
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
    • Rewinds
    • The Scan
  • EvidencePulse™
  • HypeCheck™
  • AI News
  • Classics™
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Tools
    • NPI Registry Lookup
    • RVU Search
    • Physician Pay by Specialty
    • ICD-10 Code Lookup
    • FDA Drug Approvals
    • Drug Safety for Breastfeeding/Pregnancy
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • Medical Calculators
    • ECG Reference
      • QTc Calculator
      • Sgarbossa Criteria
      • ECG Axis Calculator
      • AV Block Helper
  • Rankings
    • Medical School Rankings
    • Residency Rankings
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Advertise with Us
2 Minute Medicine
  • About
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
    • Rewinds
    • The Scan
  • EvidencePulse™
  • HypeCheck™
  • AI News
  • Classics™
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Tools
    • NPI Registry Lookup
    • RVU Search
    • Physician Pay by Specialty
    • ICD-10 Code Lookup
    • FDA Drug Approvals
    • Drug Safety for Breastfeeding/Pregnancy
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • Medical Calculators
    • ECG Reference
      • QTc Calculator
      • Sgarbossa Criteria
      • ECG Axis Calculator
      • AV Block Helper
  • Rankings
    • Medical School Rankings
    • Residency Rankings
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Advertise with Us
Sign in
SUBSCRIBE
2 Minute Medicine
Sign in
Subscribe
2 Minute MedicineFree on Google PlayGet
✦EvidencePulse™by 2 Minute Medicine3 reportsYou askedtop stroke trials 2026Synthesizing medical evidence...Top 2026 stroke trial results:OCEANIC — ischemic stroke: 6.2% vs 8.4%OPTION* — mRS 0–1: 43.6% vs 34.2%ORIENTAL* — mRS 0–2: 58.6% vs 46.6%*Higher sICH in intervention armsParticipants randomizedNOCEANIC12,327OPTION570ORIENTAL564Ask about guidelines or landmark trials...↑Try EvidencePulse™Ask the evidence. Get the signal.Try it now →
Home All Specialties Obstetrics

Risk-based screening for STI prior to IUD insertion highly sensitive

byMaren ShapiroandLeah Hawkins Bressler, MD, MPH
June 21, 2015
in Obstetrics
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

1. Risk-based screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea prior to intrauterine device insertion was more sensitive than age or partner-based screening.

Evidence Rating Level: 1 (Excellent) 

Study Rundown: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are some of the most effective forms of birth control, with a failure rate of less than one percent. Despite consistent safety data, some practitioners remain concerned about the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) after IUD placement. While low, risk of PID does increase slightly during the first 20 days after insertion (1.6 per 1000 women-years). Active infection with chlamydia or gonorrhea at the time of IUD placement increases the risk of PID, such that screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) at the time of IUD insertion is common practice. Screening recommendations have been issued by various medical organizations, but currently no standard practice exists. The CDC recommends screening women with at least 1 of 5 risk factors (≤25 years old, new or multiple sexual partners, inconsistent condom use, STI history, and exchanging sex for money, drugs, food or shelter), while The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), simply says “high risk” women should be screened. In this study, researchers preformed a secondary analysis of a large prospective cohort study to determine which of 3 screening methods would be the most sensitive for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea prior to IUD insertion.

Findings demonstrated that the risk-based screening strategy, which tested any woman who was ≤25 years old, had multiple sexual partners, reported inconsistent condom use, and/or had a history of a prior STI, was more sensitive than age or age/partner-based screening. A major strength of this study was the large, diverse cohort. Condom use was self-reported, which was a potential limitation as people often over-report condom use. Future studies looking at rates of PID following the implementation of various screening criteria would further clarify the strategy for STI screening prior to IUD insertion.

Click to read the study in Contraception

Relevant Reading: Does insertion and use of an intrauterine device increase the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease among women with sexually transmitted infection? A systematic review.

RELATED REPORTS

Religious affiliation may influence the type of contraception used by women in the postpartum period

No difference in complete expulsion of intrauterine device between early and standard interval postpartum placement

In-Depth [prospective cohort]: This secondary analysis of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, a large prospective cohort study, assessed the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values for 3 screening strategies for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae prior to IUD insertion: 1) age-based (age ≤25), 2) age/partner-based (age ≤25 and/or multiple sexual partners) and 3) risk-based (age ≤25, multiple sexual partners, inconsistent condom use, and/or history of STI).

Among women who chose an IUD at baseline (n = 5087), 140 (2.8%) tested positive for C. trachomatis, 16 (0.3%) for N. gonorrhoeae, and 6 (0.1%) for both at the time of insertion. Risk-based screening had a higher sensitivity (99.3%) than both age-based (80.7%) and age/partner-based (84.7%) screening. If risk-based screening had been implemented at the start of the trial, only one woman with a chlamydia or gonorrhea infection (0.7%) would not have been screened, compared to 29 (19.3%) and 23 (15.3%) for age-based and age/partner-based screening respectively.

Image: PD

©2015 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved. No works may be reproduced without expressed written consent from 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. Inquire about licensing here. No article should be construed as medical advice and is not intended as such by the authors or by 2 Minute Medicine, Inc.

Tags: intrauterine device (IUD)Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID)
Previous Post

Significant reduction in prostate screening rates after revised guidelines

Next Post

Diet may play role in fertility

RelatedReports

Obstetrics

Religious affiliation may influence the type of contraception used by women in the postpartum period

April 24, 2023
Lower long-term IUD use among young women
Obstetrics

No difference in complete expulsion of intrauterine device between early and standard interval postpartum placement

June 1, 2023
Contraception collage: a T-shaped IUD, a round blister pack of pills and an hourglass, looped by a teal ribbon
Emergency

Postpartum patients may be at an increased risk of intrauterine device-related perforation

June 15, 2022
Family planning providers use long acting contraception more than general population
Obstetrics

Immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion associated with increased risk of device expulsion: the APEX-IUD study

February 28, 2022
Next Post

Diet may play role in fertility

Poor adolescent health linked to negative education, employment outcomes

Publication of pneumonia antibiotic guidelines changed prescribing trends

✦ EvidencePulse™ by 2 Minute Medicine 3 reports You asked top stroke trials 2026 Synthesizing medical evidence... Top 2026 stroke trial results: OCEANIC — ischemic stroke: 6.2% vs 8.4% OPTION* — mRS 0–1: 43.6% vs 34.2% ORIENTAL* — mRS 0–2: 58.6% vs 46.6% *Higher sICH in intervention arms Participants randomizedN OCEANIC 12,327 OPTION 570 ORIENTAL 564 Ask about guidelines or landmark trials... Try EvidencePulse™ Get the signal. Try it now → Physician-trained medical AI by 2 Minute Medicine

2MM+ All Access

Full details →
$4.99 /month

3-day free trial · cancel anytime

  • ✓100+ physician-written reports
  • ✓EvidencePulse™ + HypeCheck™
  • ✓Ad-free reading + newsletters
Start 3-day free trial

Then $4.99/month. Manage renewal in your account.

2 Minute Medicine® is an award winning, physician-run, expert medical media company. Our content is curated, written and edited by practicing health professionals who have clinical and scientific expertise in their field of reporting. Our editorial management team is comprised of highly-trained MD physicians. Join numerous brands, companies, and hospitals who trust our licensed content.

Recent Reports

  • Medicaid status, race and ethnicity are independently associated with increased odds of severe maternal morbidity
  • Artificial intelligence-generated pre-visit summaries improved communication outcomes in neurosurgical consultations
  • Midline catheters may reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections compared with peripherally inserted central catheters in intensive care unit patients
License Content
Terms of Use | Disclaimer
Cookie Policy

Get the app

Read 2 Minute Medicine on iPhone, iPad and Android.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
QR code for www.2minutemedicine.com/app
On a computer? Scan this with your phone’s camera.
2MM+ All Access Full details →

The medical literature, distilled daily.

Monthly plan selected: $4.99 /month.

$4.99/month

3-day free trial · cancel anytime

Start 3-day free trial

Then $4.99/month. Manage renewal in your account.

Yearly plan selected: $49.90 /year.

$49.90/year

2 months free

Start 3-day free trial

Then $49.90/year.

Membership benefits

  • ✓100+ physician-written reports
  • ✓AI EvidencePulse™ + HypeCheck™
  • ✓Ad-free reading + newsletters
  • ✓FDA drug approvals + clinical calculators

Already a member? Sign in

  • Get the app
  • About
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
    • Rewinds
    • The Scan
  • EvidencePulse™
  • HypeCheck™
  • AI News
  • Classics™
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Tools
    • NPI Registry Lookup
    • RVU Search
    • Physician Pay by Specialty
    • ICD-10 Code Lookup
    • FDA Drug Approvals
    • Drug Safety for Breastfeeding/Pregnancy
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • Medical Calculators
    • ECG Reference
      • QTc Calculator
      • Sgarbossa Criteria
      • ECG Axis Calculator
      • AV Block Helper
  • Rankings
    • Medical School Rankings
    • Residency Rankings
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Advertise with Us
No Result
View All Result

© 2026 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. - Physician-written medical news.