• About
  • Masthead
  • License Content
  • Advertise
  • Submit Press Release
  • RSS/Email List
  • 2MM Podcast
  • Write for us
  • Contact Us
2 Minute Medicine
No Result
View All Result

No products in the cart.

SUBSCRIBE
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
  • AI Roundup
  • Pharma
  • The Scan+
  • Classics™+
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Rewinds
  • Visual
  • Podcasts
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Submit Press Release
    • Advertise with Us
  • Account
    • Subscribe
    • Sign-in
    • My account
2 Minute Medicine
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
  • AI Roundup
  • Pharma
  • The Scan+
  • Classics™+
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Rewinds
  • Visual
  • Podcasts
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Submit Press Release
    • Advertise with Us
  • Account
    • Subscribe
    • Sign-in
    • My account
SUBSCRIBE
2 Minute Medicine
Subscribe
Home All Specialties Neurology

Patient values and preferences when considering migraine prevention options

byAdrian WongandThomas Su
February 3, 2025
in Neurology, Pediatrics Classics, Pharma, Restricted
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

1. In this systematic review, patients with episodic migraine preferred oral pharmacologic treatments that reduced the severity, frequency, and duration of migraines.

2. Patients also valued a lower risk of developing migraines on day 1 post-dosing as well as a shorter duration of restriction on daily activities.

Evidence Rating Level: 1 (Excellent)

Study Rundown: The plethora of options for preventing episodic migraines means that treatment selection may often come down to personal preference, for instance one that reduces the number of migraines per month versus one that has minimal side effects. However, it is unclear which outcomes and interventions are generally most valued by patients for migraine prevention. This systematic review aimed to synthesize data regarding adult patients’ values and preferences regarding pharmacologic treatments for preventing migraines. Among the selected studies, one showed that patients considered number of days with migraines per month, number of migraine attacks per month, and time between attacks as the three most important factors. Another study reported that patients considered migraine severity and consistent treatment effectiveness as the most important factors. Data from a third study suggested that when migraine duration was longer, patients were more concerned about restrictions on daily activities. While most patients preferred oral tablets, studies on injection preferences showed that mode of administration and length of effectiveness were the most important patient values, and that patients preferred subcutaneous injection devices that automatically retracted the needle and had a shorter injection time. The generalizability of this study was limited by an inability to directly compare all attributes between studies as well as the presence of potential commercial conflicts of interest. Nevertheless, this systematic review suggested that patients prefer oral treatments that reduce migraine severity, frequency, and duration and improve ability to perform daily activities without increasing risk of developing migraines on day 1 post-dosing.

Click to read this study in AIM

Relevant Reading: Priority acute and preventive migraine treatment benefits: Results of the Migraine Clinical Outcome Assessment System (MiCOAS) qualitative study of people living with migraine

RELATED REPORTS

Bedside parameters may help predict chronic post-traumatic head and neck pain

Levofloxacin shows limited efficacy in preventing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

No significant differences between medications for episodic migraine prophylaxis

In-Depth [systematic review]: This systematic review investigated patients’ values and preferences for pharmacologic treatments that prevent episodic migraine attacks. A total of 6 studies were selected with a combined population of 2307 participants; 4 of these studies were conducted in the United States, 1 in the United States and Germany, and 1 in Japan. Participants had a mean age of 40.3 to 50.9 years, and 79.7% of participants were women. Of the 6 studies, 3 had a moderate risk of bias and 3 had a low risk of bias. Of the 40 participants in one study, 31 (78%) chose migraine frequency (days/month), migraine frequency (attacks/month), and time between attacks as the 3 most important aspects. Another study utilized relative attribute importance (RAI) to determine factors shaping a patient’s treatment preference; the attributes with the highest RAIs were migraine severity (31.7% [95% CI, 29.1% to 34.4%]) and consistent treatment effectiveness (21.8% [95% CI, 19.1% to 24.6%]). Another study found that a median 6.5% reduction in migraine risk on day 1 post-dosing was considered by patients to be equally valuable to, or more valuable than, 1 fewer migraine day within 1 month post-dosing. Further, a median reduction of 1.5 migraine days within 1 month post-dosing was as valuable as, or more valuable than, an 8% decrease in migraine risk on day 1 post-dosing. Oral tablets were the most favored mode of administration (preference weight [PW], 1.00 [standard error (SE), 0.14]), followed by quarterly injections (PW, 0.62 [SE, 0.09]) and monthly injections (PW, 0.45 [SE, 0.09]). Overall, this systematic review suggested that most patients value oral treatments that reduce migraine severity, frequency, and duration when considering pharmacologic preventative therapy for episodic migraines.

Image: PD

©2025 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved. No works may be reproduced without expressed written consent from 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. Inquire about licensing here. No article should be construed as medical advice and is not intended as such by the authors or by 2 Minute Medicine, Inc.

Tags: chronic migraineefficacy outcomesheadachemedication side effectspatient preferencesProphylaxis
Previous Post

No significant differences between medications for episodic migraine prophylaxis

Next Post

Fresh embryo transfer may yield higher rates of success for women with low prognosis for in vitro fertilization

RelatedReports

Chronic Disease

Bedside parameters may help predict chronic post-traumatic head and neck pain

May 25, 2025
Quick Take: Discovery and validation of a prognostic proteomic signature for tuberculosis progression
Infectious Disease

Levofloxacin shows limited efficacy in preventing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

March 5, 2025
Galcanezumab reduces the frequency of episodic cluster headaches
Neurology

No significant differences between medications for episodic migraine prophylaxis

February 3, 2025
Galcanezumab reduces the frequency of episodic cluster headaches
Chronic Disease

Timely diagnosis of migraine may prevent future emergency department

December 3, 2024
Next Post
Paternal factors associated with short interpregnancy interval

Fresh embryo transfer may yield higher rates of success for women with low prognosis for in vitro fertilization

Biosimilar to infliximab shows equivalent safety and efficacy for treating Crohn’s disease

Fecal Microbiota, live-jslm may be an effective means of preventing Clostridiodes difficile infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Stroke expansion following intra-arterial therapy may explain worse outcomes

Balloon-guided catheters are associated with worse outcomes in large vessel thrombectomy

2 Minute Medicine® is an award winning, physician-run, expert medical media company. Our content is curated, written and edited by practicing health professionals who have clinical and scientific expertise in their field of reporting. Our editorial management team is comprised of highly-trained MD physicians. Join numerous brands, companies, and hospitals who trust our licensed content.

Recent Reports

  • #VisualAbstract: Encorafenib, Cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 Improves Survival in BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer
  • Use of psychiatric medications may be associated with a higher risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Nivolumab plus ipilimumab improves survival over lenvatinib or sorafenib in liver cancer
License Content
Terms of Use | Disclaimer
Cookie Policy
Privacy Statement (EU)
Disclaimer

© 2021 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. - Physician-written medical news.

  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
  • AI Roundup
  • Pharma
  • The Scan
  • Classics™
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Rewinds
  • Visual
  • Podcasts
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Submit Press Release
    • Advertise with Us
  • Account
    • Subscribe
    • Sign-in
    • My account
No Result
View All Result

© 2021 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. - Physician-written medical news.