The Sgarbossa criteria detect acute myocardial infarction on an ECG with left bundle branch block, where the usual ST elevation rules don't work. Smith's modification replaces the third rule with a proportional one, catches far more coronary occlusions while staying specific, and also works in ventricular paced rhythms.
At a glance
- In left bundle branch block the ST segment normally points away from the main QRS deflection. Sgarbossa's rules look for ST changes that break that pattern.
- Rule 1: ST elevation of 1 mm or more in a lead where the QRS is positive.
- Rule 2: ST depression of 1 mm or more in V1, V2 or V3.
- Rule 3: discordant ST elevation that is too large: 5 mm or more in the original rule, or at least 25% of the preceding S wave in Smith's modification.
- The modified rule is positive with any one of the three. In its validation study it found 80% of coronary occlusions, against 49% for the original score, with 99% specificity.
- A negative result does not exclude occlusion: repeat the ECG, compare with old tracings, and use troponin and echo.
Free calculator
Sgarbossa and modified Sgarbossa checker
For a patient with left bundle branch block or a ventricular paced rhythm and symptoms of ischemia. Tick what you see, then enter any lead with ST elevation opposite a negative QRS.
Worked out in your browser. Nothing you enter is sent or saved.
Criteria
Concordant ST elevation of 1 mm or more
In any lead where the QRS is mostly positive. Original score: 5 points, enough on its own.
Concordant ST depression of 1 mm or more in V1, V2 or V3
In the right precordial leads, where the QRS of LBBB is mostly negative. Original score: 3 points, also enough on its own.
Excessively discordant ST elevation, original rule
ST elevation of 5 mm or more in a lead where the QRS is mostly negative. Original score: 2 points, so it can't reach the cutoff of 3 alone.
Proportionally excessive discordant ST elevation, Smith's rule
ST elevation of at least 1 mm that is 25% or more of the depth of the preceding S wave, an ST/S ratio of -0.25 or less. It replaces the 5 mm rule.
Scoring
Original: add the points; 3 or more is positive. Modified: unweighted, positive with any one rule.
What it looks like
Concordant ST elevation
Concordant ST depression, V1 to V3
Excessively discordant ST elevation
How to measure it
- Confirm the pattern: left bundle branch block (QRS of 120 ms or more, broad notched R in I, aVL, V5 and V6, deep S in V1) or a ventricular paced rhythm.
- In each lead, measure the ST deviation at the J point against the PR segment, in mm.
- Note whether the QRS in that lead is mostly positive or mostly negative. ST moving the same way as the QRS is concordant; the opposite way is discordant.
- For each lead with discordant ST elevation of 1 mm or more, measure the depth of the S wave from the baseline.
- Divide the ST elevation by the S depth. A result of 0.25 or more, written as an ST/S ratio of -0.25 or less, meets Smith's third rule.
What to do
- Treat a positive modified Sgarbossa result in a patient with ischemic symptoms as a STEMI equivalent and call the cath lab team, as local protocol directs.
- Don't treat new or presumed new LBBB alone as a STEMI equivalent. Decide on the ST changes, the symptoms, the hemodynamics and the troponin.
- If the ECG is negative but suspicion stays high, repeat it at short intervals, compare with an old ECG and get an urgent echocardiogram to look for a new wall motion abnormality.
- Patients with LBBB in shock, or with ongoing ischemic pain despite treatment, need urgent angiography whatever the ECG shows.
Pitfalls and mimics
- Using the 5 mm rule alone: in high-voltage LBBB, 5 mm of discordant ST elevation can be normal, and in low-voltage LBBB less than 5 mm can mean occlusion.
- Relying on the original weighted score to rule out MI: it misses about half of occlusions.
- Working out the ST/S ratio in a lead without discordant ST elevation of at least 1 mm.
- Applying Sgarbossa to right bundle branch block: standard STEMI criteria still work in RBBB.
Key studies
Sgarbossa 1996, N Engl J Med
Of 26,003 North American patients in the GUSTO-1 trial, 131 had acute MI with LBBB. Three ST criteria predicted infarction independently and were combined into a 0 to 10 score that made a highly specific diagnosis possible.
Smith 2012, Ann Emerg Med
In 33 patients with LBBB and an angiographically occluded artery and 129 controls, replacing the 5 mm rule with an ST/S ratio of -0.25 or less raised sensitivity to 91%, from 52% for the weighted score, with 90% specificity.
Meyers 2015, Am Heart J
In a separate cohort of 45 occlusions and 249 controls, the modified criteria were 80% sensitive and 99% specific, against 49% and 100% for the original weighted criteria.
Dodd 2021, Ann Emerg Med (PERFECT)
In ventricular paced rhythm, the modified criteria found 81% of occlusion MIs against 56% for the original criteria, with 96% specificity in emergency department controls.
EvidencePulse™by 2 Minute Medicine®
Go deeper into the evidence.
Ask how a finding applies to your patient, or what the studies behind a criterion found. No ads, no sponsored answers.
2MM+New ECG research, summarized for clinicians
Read our physician-written summaries of new ECG and arrhythmia studies and of the landmark trials behind these criteria. 2MM+ includes every article, EvidencePulse and HypeCheck.
In our archive
Get new ECG studies by email
The free 2MM Daily Brief: new research in cardiology and every other specialty, summarized by physicians.
Opens Mailchimp to confirm. Unsubscribe anytime.
More ECG pages
Questions clinicians ask
What are the Sgarbossa criteria?
Three ECG rules for diagnosing acute MI in left bundle branch block: concordant ST elevation of 1 mm or more (5 points), concordant ST depression of 1 mm or more in V1 to V3 (3 points), and discordant ST elevation of 5 mm or more (2 points). A score of 3 or more is positive.
What is the modified Sgarbossa (Smith) rule?
It keeps the first two rules and replaces the 5 mm rule with a proportional one: discordant ST elevation of at least 1 mm that is 25% or more of the preceding S wave. Any one rule makes it positive. It is far more sensitive than the original score and nearly as specific.
Do the Sgarbossa criteria work in paced rhythms?
Yes. Sgarbossa's group described their use in ventricular paced rhythm in 1996, and the PERFECT study (Dodd 2021) found the modified criteria 81% sensitive and 96% specific for occlusion MI in paced patients.
Is new LBBB a STEMI equivalent?
Not on its own. Since the 2013 ACCF/AHA STEMI guideline, new or presumed new LBBB is no longer a stand-alone reason for reperfusion; the decision rests on symptoms, hemodynamics and ST criteria such as Sgarbossa's.
How do I calculate the ST/S ratio?
In the same lead, measure the ST elevation at the J point and the depth of the S wave, both from the baseline in mm, and divide the ST elevation by the S depth. With 3 mm of ST elevation after a 10 mm S wave the ratio is -0.30, which meets the rule.
Sources
- Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(8):481-487. doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199602223340801
- Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Gates KB, Wagner GS. Early electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of ventricular paced rhythm. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77(5):423-424. doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89377-0
- Smith SW, Dodd KW, Henry TD, et al. Diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block with the ST-elevation to S-wave ratio in a modified Sgarbossa rule. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(6):766-776. doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.119
- Meyers HP, Limkakeng AT Jr, Jaffa EJ, et al. Validation of the modified Sgarbossa criteria for acute coronary occlusion in the setting of left bundle branch block: a retrospective case-control study. Am Heart J. 2015;170(6):1255-1264. doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.09.005
- Dodd KW, Zvosec DL, Hart MA, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion myocardial infarction in ventricular paced rhythm using the modified Sgarbossa criteria. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78(4):517-529. doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.03.036
- O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2013;127(4):e362-e425. doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6
- Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018;138(20):e618-e651. doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617
- Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2025;151(13):e771-e862. doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309
Written in our own words by 2 Minute Medicine's physician editors from the sources listed here. The diagrams are schematic drawings made for 2MM, not patient tracings. This page supports, and does not replace, a full ECG reading and clinical judgment.
For health care professionals. Values are for adults unless a page says otherwise.