• About
  • Masthead
  • License Content
  • Advertise
  • Press Releases
  • Newsroom
  • RSS/Email List
  • 2MM Podcast
  • Write for us
  • Contact Us
2 Minute Medicine
No Result
View All Result

No products in the cart.

Sign in
SUBSCRIBE
  • About
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
    • Rewinds
    • The Scan
  • EvidencePulse™
  • HypeCheck™
  • AI News
  • Classics™
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Tools
    • NPI Registry Lookup
    • RVU Search
    • Physician Pay by Specialty
    • ICD-10 Code Lookup
    • FDA Drug Approvals
    • Drug Safety for Breastfeeding/Pregnancy
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • Medical Calculators
    • ECG Reference
      • QTc Calculator
      • Sgarbossa Criteria
      • ECG Axis Calculator
      • AV Block Helper
  • Rankings
    • Medical School Rankings
    • Residency Rankings
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Advertise with Us
2 Minute Medicine
  • About
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
    • Rewinds
    • The Scan
  • EvidencePulse™
  • HypeCheck™
  • AI News
  • Classics™
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Tools
    • NPI Registry Lookup
    • RVU Search
    • Physician Pay by Specialty
    • ICD-10 Code Lookup
    • FDA Drug Approvals
    • Drug Safety for Breastfeeding/Pregnancy
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • Medical Calculators
    • ECG Reference
      • QTc Calculator
      • Sgarbossa Criteria
      • ECG Axis Calculator
      • AV Block Helper
  • Rankings
    • Medical School Rankings
    • Residency Rankings
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Advertise with Us
Sign in
SUBSCRIBE
2 Minute Medicine
Sign in
Subscribe
2 Minute MedicineFree on Google PlayGet
✦EvidencePulse™by 2 Minute Medicine3 reportsYou askedtop stroke trials 2026Synthesizing medical evidence...Top 2026 stroke trial results:OCEANIC — ischemic stroke: 6.2% vs 8.4%OPTION* — mRS 0–1: 43.6% vs 34.2%ORIENTAL* — mRS 0–2: 58.6% vs 46.6%*Higher sICH in intervention armsParticipants randomizedNOCEANIC12,327OPTION570ORIENTAL564Ask about guidelines or landmark trials...↑Try EvidencePulse™Ask the evidence. Get the signal.Try it now →
Home All Specialties Obstetrics

C-section surgical techniques yield equivalent outcomes

byAndrew Bishara
June 1, 2013
in Obstetrics, Surgery
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Image: PD

1. Different c-section techniques  (blunt vs. sharp entry, single-layer vs. double-layer closure, etc.) resulted in equivalent risk for short-term maternal and infant morbidity.

2. Compared to using polyglactin-910 (PG-910) sutures, the use of chromic catgut sutures for uterine repair was associated with lower likelihood of requiring >1 unit of blood.

Evidence Rating Level: 1 (Excellent)

Study Rundown: This study found that among five c-section dissection and suturing techniques, none demonstrated statistical superiority in reducing the incidence of a primary composite outcome for maternal and infant morbidity. However, women who received uterine closure with chromic catgut uterine sutures were less likely to receive >1 unit of blood in the post-partum period. These findings suggest surgeons could use the technique of their choosing without affecting short-term maternal and infant outcomes.

Strengths of this study include a prospective design within a large RCT, a diverse study population, and assessment of maternal and fetal outcomes through multiple measures. Limitations include variable compliance with treatment protocols and evaluation of short-term outcomes only (up to 6 weeks post-partum). Further studies should evaluate the impact of these c-section techniques on longer-term outcomes and might also assess the generalizability of these results in other countries.

RELATED REPORTS

AI-drafted responses to patient messages linked to faster reply times but no drop in after-hours work for clinicians

Early mitral valve surgery may improve long-term survival in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation

Click to read the study in The Lancet

Relevant Reading: UpToDate: Cesarean delivery technique

Study Author, Professor Peter Brocklehurst, talks to 2 Minute Medicine: University College London, Director of the Institute for Women’s Health, Co-Director of the Policy Research Unit – Maternal Health and Care and Professor of Perinatal Epidemiology.

“The CORONIS trial is larger than all the existing trials added together and becomes the current evidence base for these interventions. The most surprising finding was that there were almost no differences in the outcomes we measured between any of the intervention pairs that we looked at. This reassures clinicians that their current practice appears to be safe and that though we still need to know the long-term implications of these different techniques, for the moment there is nothing to suggest one approach is clearly superior to another.

The only statistically significant finding was in the choice of suture material used to close the uterine incision and the outcome of blood transfusion. This, against expectations, favoured the use of chromic catgut when compared with polyglactin 910. The former material is no longer used in many developed countries, where it has been abandoned in favour of more modern and more expensive synthetic material, which has theoretical advantages. Either this is a spurious association, or it could be true – in which case it eloquently illustrates the difference between theoretical benefit and actual benefit.”

In-Depth [non-blinded, randomized controlled trial]: This trial, conducted from 2007 through 2010 compared five c-section techniques, 1) blunt vs. sharp abdominal entry; 2) exterior vs. intra-abdominal uterine repair; 3) single-layer vs. double-layer closure of the uterus; 4) closure vs. non-closure of the peritoneum; and 5) chromic catgut vs. polyglactin-910 (PG-910) uterine sutures, in 19 locations in 7 countries throughout South America and Africa. Each site was assigned to two techniques, and 15,935 pregnant women undergoing c-section were randomized to intervention pairs. Outcomes included a composite of maternal infection, maternal death, additional operations, maternal blood transfusion of more than 1 unit, pain interventions, stillbirth, infant morbidity and mortality, other maternal morbidity and health service utilization within 6 weeks of delivery.

Overall, no significant association was observed when comparing the incidence of composite outcome by any two surgical techniques. However, women receiving chromic catgut sutures were less likely than those receiving PG-910 sutures to require >1 unit blood transfused (RR 0.53, CI 0.30-0.93).

By Denise Pong and Leah Hawkins, M.D.

More from this author: Patient centeredness poor predictor of fertility care dropout, High BMI in early adulthood linked to reduced risk of endometriosis, Obtaining consent for c-section during labor may be suboptimal

© 2013 2minutemedicine.com. All rights reserved. No works may be reproduced without written consent from 2minutemedicine.com. Disclaimer: We present factual information directly from peer reviewed medical journals. No post should be construed as medical advice and is not intended as such by the authors or by 2minutemedicine.com. PLEASE SEE A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER IN YOUR AREA IF YOU SEEK MEDICAL ADVICE OF ANY SORT. Content is produced in accordance with fair use copyrights solely and strictly for the purpose of teaching, news and criticism. No benefit, monetary or otherwise, is realized by any participants or the owner of this domain. 

Tags: c-sectionClinical trialsdissectiondouble-layerhealthinfant mortalitymaternal mortalityobstetricssingle-layerSurgerysuture
Previous Post

Novel Mid-East coronavirus (MERS-CoV): First detailed report

Next Post

Updated USPSTF guidelines favor treatment of mild gestational diabetes

RelatedReports

Clinical AI collage: a thoughtful clinician in a white coat beside a network of blue dots, a closed blank folder and a ribbon
All Specialties

AI-drafted responses to patient messages linked to faster reply times but no drop in after-hours work for clinicians

November 3, 2026
Mitral valve prolapse collage of an engraved heart with a parachute-like valve, a stethoscope and a calm woman
Cardiology

Early mitral valve surgery may improve long-term survival in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation

October 31, 2026
An artistic representation featuring a door with a key, symbolizing access or opportunity, alongside images of buildings and a heartbeat line, suggesting themes of health and housing.
Chronic Disease

A community health initiative in low-income areas may reduce hospital admission rates

October 20, 2026
Two pieces of fabric showing stitching techniques with surgical tools in the foreground, indicating procedures for hernia repair.
Gastroenterology

Induction with remimazolam (Byfavo) for patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery may reduce post-operative delirium compared with propofol

October 20, 2026
Next Post
Updated USPSTF guidelines favor treatment of mild gestational diabetes

Updated USPSTF guidelines favor treatment of mild gestational diabetes

Universal decolonization effective at reducing MRSA

Universal decolonization effective at reducing MRSA

Short-term zinc prophylaxis decreases infant diarrhea morbidity

Short-term zinc prophylaxis decreases infant diarrhea morbidity

✦ EvidencePulse™ by 2 Minute Medicine 3 reports You asked top stroke trials 2026 Synthesizing medical evidence... Top 2026 stroke trial results: OCEANIC — ischemic stroke: 6.2% vs 8.4% OPTION* — mRS 0–1: 43.6% vs 34.2% ORIENTAL* — mRS 0–2: 58.6% vs 46.6% *Higher sICH in intervention arms Participants randomizedN OCEANIC 12,327 OPTION 570 ORIENTAL 564 Ask about guidelines or landmark trials... Try EvidencePulse™ Get the signal. Try it now → Physician-trained medical AI by 2 Minute Medicine

2MM+ All Access

Full details →
$4.99 /month

3-day free trial · cancel anytime

  • ✓100+ physician-written reports
  • ✓EvidencePulse™ + HypeCheck™
  • ✓Ad-free reading + newsletters
Start 3-day free trial

Then $4.99/month. Manage renewal in your account.

NPI Lookup · Free

Look up any US clinician

Search by name or NPI number, live from the CMS NPI Registry.

  • OIG exclusion check
  • Licenses and specialties
  • No account needed
Open NPI Lookup →

2 Minute Medicine® is an award winning, physician-run, expert medical media company. Our content is curated, written and edited by practicing health professionals who have clinical and scientific expertise in their field of reporting. Our editorial management team is comprised of highly-trained MD physicians. Join numerous brands, companies, and hospitals who trust our licensed content.

Recent Reports

  • Non-inpatient care settings may offer alternatives to inpatient beds for select patients
  • Pirtobrutinib improves progression-free survival versus bendamustine plus rituximab in previously untreated CLL/SLL
  • Angiography-derived vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) was noninferior to pressure wire–based fractional flow reserve (FFR) for guiding revascularization in intermediate coronary stenoses
License Content
Terms of Use | Disclaimer
Cookie Policy

Get the app

Read 2 Minute Medicine on iPhone, iPad and Android.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
QR code for www.2minutemedicine.com/app
On a computer? Scan this with your phone’s camera.
2MM+ All Access Full details →

The medical literature, distilled daily.

Monthly plan selected: $4.99 /month.

$4.99/month

3-day free trial · cancel anytime

Start 3-day free trial

Then $4.99/month. Manage renewal in your account.

Yearly plan selected: $49.90 /year.

$49.90/year

2 months free

Start 3-day free trial

Then $49.90/year.

Membership benefits

  • ✓100+ physician-written reports
  • ✓AI EvidencePulse™ + HypeCheck™
  • ✓Ad-free reading + newsletters
  • ✓FDA drug approvals + clinical calculators

Already a member? Sign in

  • Get the app
  • About
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
    • Rewinds
    • The Scan
  • EvidencePulse™
  • HypeCheck™
  • AI News
  • Classics™
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Tools
    • NPI Registry Lookup
    • RVU Search
    • Physician Pay by Specialty
    • ICD-10 Code Lookup
    • FDA Drug Approvals
    • Drug Safety for Breastfeeding/Pregnancy
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • Medical Calculators
    • ECG Reference
      • QTc Calculator
      • Sgarbossa Criteria
      • ECG Axis Calculator
      • AV Block Helper
  • Rankings
    • Medical School Rankings
    • Residency Rankings
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Advertise with Us
No Result
View All Result

© 2026 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. - Physician-written medical news.