• About
  • Masthead
  • License Content
  • Advertise
  • Press Releases
  • Newsroom
  • RSS/Email List
  • 2MM Podcast
  • Write for us
  • Contact Us
2 Minute Medicine
No Result
View All Result

No products in the cart.

Sign in
SUBSCRIBE
  • About
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
    • Rewinds
    • The Scan
  • EvidencePulse™
  • HypeCheck™
  • AI News
  • Classics™
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Tools
    • NPI Registry Lookup
    • RVU Search
    • Physician Pay by Specialty
    • ICD-10 Code Lookup
    • FDA Drug Approvals
    • Drug Safety for Breastfeeding/Pregnancy
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • Medical Calculators
    • ECG Reference
      • QTc Calculator
      • Sgarbossa Criteria
      • ECG Axis Calculator
      • AV Block Helper
  • Rankings
    • Medical School Rankings
    • Residency Rankings
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Advertise with Us
2 Minute Medicine
  • About
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
    • Rewinds
    • The Scan
  • EvidencePulse™
  • HypeCheck™
  • AI News
  • Classics™
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Tools
    • NPI Registry Lookup
    • RVU Search
    • Physician Pay by Specialty
    • ICD-10 Code Lookup
    • FDA Drug Approvals
    • Drug Safety for Breastfeeding/Pregnancy
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • Medical Calculators
    • ECG Reference
      • QTc Calculator
      • Sgarbossa Criteria
      • ECG Axis Calculator
      • AV Block Helper
  • Rankings
    • Medical School Rankings
    • Residency Rankings
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Advertise with Us
Sign in
SUBSCRIBE
2 Minute Medicine
Sign in
Subscribe
2 Minute MedicineFree on Google PlayGet
✦EvidencePulse™by 2 Minute Medicine3 reportsYou askedtop stroke trials 2026Synthesizing medical evidence...Top 2026 stroke trial results:OCEANIC — ischemic stroke: 6.2% vs 8.4%OPTION* — mRS 0–1: 43.6% vs 34.2%ORIENTAL* — mRS 0–2: 58.6% vs 46.6%*Higher sICH in intervention armsParticipants randomizedNOCEANIC12,327OPTION570ORIENTAL564Ask about guidelines or landmark trials...↑Try EvidencePulse™Ask the evidence. Get the signal.Try it now →
Home The Classics Critical, Emergent and Pulmonary Care Classics

The ICTUS trial: Early invasive or selectively invasive management for ACS [Classics Series]

byAndrew Cheung, MD MBA
June 23, 2013
in Critical, Emergent and Pulmonary Care Classics, Interventional Literature Classics, The Classics
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Image: PD

1. There was no significant difference in the composite rate of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or rehospitalization for angina in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with early invasive versus selectively invasive strategies

2. Myocardial infarction was significantly more frequent in the early invasive management group but rehospitalization was significantly less frequent in this group

Original Date of Publication: September 15, 2005

Study Rundown: Guidelines of the American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology recommend an early invasive strategy for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) without ST-segment elevation based on evidence from multiple previously conducted randomized trials. The ICTUS trial suggests that selectively invasive management may be an acceptable alternative approach to treatment. With advances in medical therapy and higher rates of revascularization, patients treated with the selectively invasive strategy showed no difference in the cumulative rate of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or rehospitalization for angina at one-year after randomization.

These results suggest that an early invasive strategy may not be superior to a selectively invasive strategy for the treatment of ACS without ST-segment elevation and with elevated cardiac troponin T levels.

Please click to read study in NEJM

EvidencePulse™by 2 Minute Medicine®

How does ICTUS apply to your patient?

Describe your patient and EvidencePulse weighs this trial against later evidence and current guidelines, with citations.

Ask EvidencePulse

For a fuller review of the evidence, Deep research is a core feature of 2MM Max.

In-Depth [randomized, controlled study]: In this study, published in 2005 in NEJM, 1,200 patients with ACS without ST-segment elevation and with elevated cardiac troponin T levels were randomly assigned to management with early invasive strategy or selectively invasive strategy. Both treatment groups received optimized medical therapy. The early invasive strategy involved angiography within 24 to 48 hours of randomization and percutaneous coronary intervention where appropriate. Patients assigned to selectively invasive management were scheduled for angiography and revascularization only if symptoms persisted despite medical therapy or if patients showed hemodynamic or rhythmic instability. A composite of death, recurrent myocardial infarction or rehospitalization for angina within one year was measured as the primary endpoint. There was no significant difference in the cumulative event rate at one-year between the two groups. Mortality at one-year after randomization was 2.5% in both groups. The risk of myocardial infarction was significantly higher in the early invasive strategy group, while rehospitalization was significantly less frequent in this group.

By Adrienne Cheung, Andrew Cheung, M.D.

Trials since this one

What later trials found on the same question.

  1. 2007

    COURAGE In The Classics

    Addition of percutaneous cutaneous intervention (PCI) to optimal medical therapy for patients with stable coronary artery disease does not improve mortality or cardiovascular outcomes

  2. 2007

    TRITON In The Classics

    Prasugrel was more effective than clopidogrel in reducing the incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, though there was no difference in mortality between the two…

10 more since 2005

2MM+ See every trial since ICTUS

2MM+ shows the full timeline of later trials on this question, with what each one found, and lets you save trials to reading lists for rounds, journal club and boards.

See 2MM+ plans Sign in

Citation: de Winter RJ, Windhausen F, Cornel JH, Dunselman PH, Janus CL, Bendermacher PE, et al. Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 15;353(11):1095-104. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa044259. Epub 2005 Sep 14. PMID: 16162880.

© 2013 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. To license this content, contact 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. This article is for informational and educational purposes only; it is not medical advice and does not replace the judgment of a qualified healthcare professional.
Image: PD

Tags: acute coronary syndromesanginaICTUSmyocardial infarction

New landmark trials, every weekday

The free 2 Minute Medicine Daily Brief: practice-changing studies summarized by physicians, in your inbox.

Your subscription opens securely in a new tab.

More Critical care and pulmonary Classics

Previous Post

Previous concussion linked to prolonged symptoms following second concussion

Next Post

Antimicrobial stewardship reduces broad-spectrum antibiotic use in pediatrics

Next Post
Metagenomics: A new method of identifying bacterial outbreaks

Antimicrobial stewardship reduces broad-spectrum antibiotic use in pediatrics

2 Minute Medicine Rewind: June 1 - June 9

The EVAR I trial: Endovascular vs. open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [Classics Series]

✦ EvidencePulse™ by 2 Minute Medicine 3 reports You asked top stroke trials 2026 Synthesizing medical evidence... Top 2026 stroke trial results: OCEANIC — ischemic stroke: 6.2% vs 8.4% OPTION* — mRS 0–1: 43.6% vs 34.2% ORIENTAL* — mRS 0–2: 58.6% vs 46.6% *Higher sICH in intervention arms Participants randomizedN OCEANIC 12,327 OPTION 570 ORIENTAL 564 Ask about guidelines or landmark trials... Try EvidencePulse™ Get the signal. Try it now → Physician-trained medical AI by 2 Minute Medicine

2MM+ All Access

Full details →
$4.99 /month

3-day free trial · cancel anytime

  • ✓100+ physician-written reports
  • ✓EvidencePulse™ + HypeCheck™
  • ✓Ad-free reading + newsletters
Start 3-day free trial

Then $4.99/month. Manage renewal in your account.

2 Minute Medicine® is an award winning, physician-run, expert medical media company. Our content is curated, written and edited by practicing health professionals who have clinical and scientific expertise in their field of reporting. Our editorial management team is comprised of highly-trained MD physicians. Join numerous brands, companies, and hospitals who trust our licensed content.

Recent Reports

  • Medicaid status, race and ethnicity are independently associated with increased odds of severe maternal morbidity
  • Artificial intelligence-generated pre-visit summaries improved communication outcomes in neurosurgical consultations
  • Midline catheters may reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections compared with peripherally inserted central catheters in intensive care unit patients
License Content
Terms of Use | Disclaimer
Cookie Policy

Get the app

Read 2 Minute Medicine on iPhone, iPad and Android.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
QR code for www.2minutemedicine.com/app
On a computer? Scan this with your phone’s camera.
2MM+ All Access Full details →

The medical literature, distilled daily.

Monthly plan selected: $4.99 /month.

$4.99/month

3-day free trial · cancel anytime

Start 3-day free trial

Then $4.99/month. Manage renewal in your account.

Yearly plan selected: $49.90 /year.

$49.90/year

2 months free

Start 3-day free trial

Then $49.90/year.

Membership benefits

  • ✓100+ physician-written reports
  • ✓AI EvidencePulse™ + HypeCheck™
  • ✓Ad-free reading + newsletters
  • ✓FDA drug approvals + clinical calculators

Already a member? Sign in

  • Get the app
  • About
  • Specialties
    • All Specialties, All Recent Reports
    • Cardiology
    • Chronic Disease
    • Dermatology
    • Emergency
    • Endocrinology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Imaging and Intervention
    • Infectious Disease
    • Nephrology
    • Neurology
    • Obstetrics
    • Oncology
    • Ophthalmology
    • Pediatrics
    • Pharma
    • Preclinical
    • Psychiatry
    • Public Health
    • Pulmonology
    • Rheumatology
    • Surgery
    • Rewinds
    • The Scan
  • EvidencePulse™
  • HypeCheck™
  • AI News
  • Classics™
    • 2MM+ Online Access
    • Paperback and Ebook
  • Tools
    • NPI Registry Lookup
    • RVU Search
    • Physician Pay by Specialty
    • ICD-10 Code Lookup
    • FDA Drug Approvals
    • Drug Safety for Breastfeeding/Pregnancy
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • Medical Calculators
    • ECG Reference
      • QTc Calculator
      • Sgarbossa Criteria
      • ECG Axis Calculator
      • AV Block Helper
  • Rankings
    • Medical School Rankings
    • Residency Rankings
  • Partners
    • License Content
    • Advertise with Us
No Result
View All Result

© 2026 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. - Physician-written medical news.