1. Intensive glycemic control in critically ill patients significantly increases 90-day mortality when compared to conventional glycemic control.
2. The incidence of severe hypoglycemia was significantly higher in patients receiving intensive glycemic control.
Original Date of Publication: March 26, 2009
This study summary is an excerpt from the book 2 Minute Medicine’s The Classics in Medicine: Summaries of the Landmark Trials, 2e (The Classics Series).
Study Rundown: In the intensive care unit (ICU), hyperglycemia is a common problem that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Previously conducted trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses had reached conflicting conclusions on the effects of intensive glycemic control. Different groups, however, recommended intensive control for critically ill patients. The Normoglycemia in Intensive Care Evaluation-Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation (NICE-SUGAR) trial sought to determine the impacts of intensive glycemic control on mortality in ICU patients. In summary, the trial demonstrated that intensive glucose control to target 81-108 mg/dL (4.5-6.0 mmol/L) significantly increased 90-day mortality (OR 1.14; 95%CI 1.02-1.28; ARI 2.6%, NNH 38) when compared to conventional glucose control to target ≤180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L). Moreover, the risk of severe hypoglycemia was significantly higher in the intensive control group (OR 14.7; 95%CI 9.0-25.9). Based on the findings of this study, intensive glucose control was not recommended for patients in the ICU.
Click to read the study in NEJM
In-Depth [randomized, controlled study]: The study involved 6,104 participants recruited from 42 hospitals from across Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. Patients were eligible if they stayed a minimum of 3 consecutive days in the ICU. Participants were randomly assigned to either intensive glucose control (target blood glucose between 81-108 mg/dL, or 4.5-6.0 mmol/L) or conventional glucose control (target blood glucose ≤180 mg/dL, or ≤10 mmol/L). Glucose control was achieved through insulin infusion as needed. The intervention was stopped when the patient was eating or discharged from the ICU. The primary outcome was death from any cause within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included survival time in the first 90 days, cause-specific death, and durations of mechanical ventilation/renal replacement therapy/ICU stay/hospital stay.
Intensive glucose control significantly increased the risk of mortality at day 90 when compared to conventional control (OR 1.14; 95%CI 1.02-1.28; ARI 2.6%, NNH 38). The incidence of severe hypoglycemia was significantly higher in patients undergoing intensive glucose control (OR 14.7; 95%CI 9.0-25.9). There were no significant differences between the groups in mechanical ventilation (p=0.56) or renal replacement therapy requirements (p=0.39). Moreover, there were no differences between the groups in terms of duration of ICU (p=0.84) or hospital stay (p=0.86).
Trials since this one
What later trials found on the same question.
- 2012
FREEDOM In The Classics
In patients with diabetes and multivessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was shown to be superior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents in reducing the risk of all-cause…
- 2019
CREDENCE In The Classics
In this study, a composite of end-stage kidney disease, double of serum creatinine, and renal or cardiovascular death was significantly lower in diabetic patients taking canagliflozin (43.2%) as compared to a placebo…
2 more since 2009
2MM+ See every trial since NICE-SUGAR
2MM+ shows the full timeline of later trials on this question, with what each one found, and lets you save trials to reading lists for rounds, journal club and boards.
Citation: Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, Blair D, Foster D, Dhingra V, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1283-97. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa0810625. Epub 2009 Mar 24. PMID: 19318384.
© 2023 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. To license this content, contact 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. This article is for informational and educational purposes only; it is not medical advice and does not replace the judgment of a qualified healthcare professional.
Image: PD
![ABCD2 Score: Predicting Early Stroke Risk After Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) [Classics Series]](https://www.2minutemedicine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/web-cover-classics-with-logo-medicine-BW-small-jpg-750x536.jpg)




![ABCD2 Score: Predicting Early Stroke Risk After Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) [Classics Series]](https://www.2minutemedicine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/web-cover-classics-with-logo-medicine-BW-small-jpg-75x75.jpg)
